| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Tragot Gomndor wrote: 0.0 need more nerfs not more buffs. Eve needs more interessting pve content anyway, not just higher numbers. Currently eve pve is the worst pve of all games i know. And yes, fix sov too. Tidi/lag/crash and sovwarfare made ...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.27 03:54:00
|
2. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arh Mezz wrote: so i did now. doesnt change anything. a few good arguments, but the OP's statements stay. he said make certain sites only doable with 5-10 groups. or in other words, drop one carrier. I agree, that would be a bad idea. I al...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.27 03:49:00
|
3. I dont like my character name - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anne Dieu-leveut wrote: Tossmy Salad wrote: Look at it this way Jeff, the next time an enemy FC is about to call you primary, he may skip you and go right to Bob. Thats why some people called themselves "Primary" Yes, I'd like to change...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 05:11:00
|
4. I dont like my character name - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pix Severus wrote: Doireen Kaundur wrote: I came across one "Lady Areola Fappington" Did you have permission? ROFLOL ... you literally had me crying on that one
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 05:01:00
|
5. I dont like my character name - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: Stealth "Name change 4 PLEX plz" thread. No. Names have consequences. No they don't. I'll just buy a new toon.
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 04:56:00
|
6. Username Changing! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Are we talking about usernames or toon names? Either way, I support both.
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 04:52:00
|
7. Add more gender options - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nag'o wrote: Wait, how is sex not binary. Here are some steps you can use to educate yourself Step 1) Watch the following movies: "The Rocky Horror Picture Show", "Boys don't cry", "The Silence of the Lambs" Step 2) Explore some more of th...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 04:34:00
|
8. Add more gender options - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fourteen Maken wrote: GreenSeed wrote: couldn't you fix this with a few lines of RP text in your bio? Exactly my first thought; what would a transgender avatar look like anyway, because it's not like you can undress them to see if they ha...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 04:22:00
|
9. Neural remap purchase - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Agree with this approach. I see no reason why this approach is any different than implants. CCP, please consider!
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 04:09:00
|
10. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
TehCloud wrote: Nullsec ISK Faucets are not in need of a buff. Think of it this way, nerfs to passive 0.0 income need to be made up from somewhere in order to drive 0.0 SRPs and conflict. Don't believe me? As anyone from TEST or N3 if havin...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 03:38:00
|
11. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Daichi Yamato wrote: im hesitant to agree with the increased payouts of null ... so id agree reward needs to go up in order for null to live up to its reputation, but so does risk from other players. Ok, I think I wasn't clear. I'm not tal...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 03:21:00
|
12. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Batelle wrote: Guillaume Conquerant wrote: Basically, I think Havens should require ~5 people to run them effectively and Sanctums should require ~10. Isk/hr per person should also be buffed. None of your suggestions is even close to maki...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.26 01:34:00
|
13. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ok, we got some REALLY good ideas going here IMHO. I completely agree with Kimmi Chan's analysis and reasoning for not increasing faction/officer spawns ... so if you did increase their likelihood, it should only be slightly. The ESS does help wi...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.18 04:47:00
|
14. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
^^ Anyone have better ideas on how to buff PVE in 0.0? Basically, this adapts the cooperative aspects of incursions into anoms while giving people looking for PVP an additional opportunity to generate content ;)
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.17 23:17:00
|
15. Null Sec Overhaul (Part 1: Outposts) (A Necessity for Eve Decade #2) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So the problem you're talking about is the coalition level politics and how you don't want to bend a knee to others. If you get a group of skilled pilots together and prove yourself in lowsec, your chances of getting into a 0.0 alliance are decent...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.17 21:01:00
|
16. Havens & Sanctums need buffing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
TL;DR version - increase the difficulty and isk/hr for Havens and Sanctums. The scaling (difficulty, investment, payout) on anoms needs serious attention; the higher-end anoms need a serious buffing. That is, they need to be harder and significan...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.17 20:20:00
|
17. Need better isk faucets in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sura Sadiva wrote: I can jump from low to null in cov ops and gather 200m/hours simply with relic/data sites. What is relevant in these thread is to see how HS carebears and null bears ask exactly the same stuff: more free isk faucets (as the...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.17 19:49:00
|
18. Need better isk faucets in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mario Putzo wrote: There needs to be a massive reduction in available ISK from all PASSIVE sources. ^^ There, I fixed that for you.
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.17 19:39:00
|
19. Need better isk faucets in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kimmi Chan wrote: If you have an idea you should put it in F&I. If you would like something formally introduced or voiced to CCP you can also try the CSM forums. Otherwise this thread lacks any real content and will amount to nothing but t...
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.17 19:33:00
|
20. Need better isk faucets in 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
disgregard
- by Guillaume Conquerant - at 2014.02.17 19:32:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |